<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mercurycom.com.au</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mercurycom.com.au/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mercurycom.com.au</link>
	<description>Mercury Commercial Law Firm, Sydney Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fired by text message – FWA upholds employer’s dismissal</title>
		<link>http://mercurycom.com.au/2011/09/fired-by-text-message-%e2%80%93-fwa-upholds-employer%e2%80%99s-dismissal/</link>
		<comments>http://mercurycom.com.au/2011/09/fired-by-text-message-%e2%80%93-fwa-upholds-employer%e2%80%99s-dismissal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MercuryCom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercurycom.com.au/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision by Fair Work Australia Commissioner Raffaelli on15 September, 2011 upholding the termination by an employer of an employee via a texted message has renewed interest in the way managers and staff should communicate matters between themselves.  While the decision centred around the issue of whether a painter failing to add an essential additive ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmercurycom.com.au%2F2011%2F09%2Ffired-by-text-message-%25e2%2580%2593-fwa-upholds-employer%25e2%2580%2599s-dismissal%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmercurycom.com.au%2F2011%2F09%2Ffired-by-text-message-%25e2%2580%2593-fwa-upholds-employer%25e2%2580%2599s-dismissal%2F&amp;source=MercuryCom&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The decision by Fair Work Australia Commissioner Raffaelli on15 September, 2011 upholding the termination by an employer of an employee via a texted message has renewed interest in the way managers and staff should communicate matters between themselves.</p>
<p> While the decision centred around the issue of whether a painter failing to add an essential additive to a paint mixture (causing $74,000 damages) was guilty of misconduct, the bulk of interest in the case concerned the way the decision was communicated to the employee, who had proceeded onto annual leave and was about to fly overseas.</p>
<p> The employer argued he had already discussed the matter with the employee by phone and as the employee was on annual leave, it was not inappropriate to communicate his decision to terminate the employee by way of a text message. The employee argued he had not been given adequate opportunity to defend himself and it was inappropriate to terminate him by text message while he was on annual leave.</p>
<p> Commissioner Raffaelli found in favour of the employer, holding that while in most situations termination by text message is not appropriate, in this case the outcome for the employee would have probably been the same even if he was able to attend a face to face meeting with his manager. Accordingly, the employee’s dismissal was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable.</p>
<p> The latest decision of Fair Work Australia compares with an earlier case this year where Commissioner Cambridge found the dismissal of a salesperson by text message deprived her of any opportunity to respond to the allegations – this constituted a fundamental breach of the notions of procedural fairness, even for a small business.</p>
<p> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Martin v DecoGlaze Pty Ltd</span> (15 September, 2011 – U2011/8460)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mercurycom.com.au/2011/09/fired-by-text-message-%e2%80%93-fwa-upholds-employer%e2%80%99s-dismissal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Workcover legislation in 2012</title>
		<link>http://mercurycom.com.au/2010/07/new-workcover-legislation-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://mercurycom.com.au/2010/07/new-workcover-legislation-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MercuryCom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workcover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercurycom.com.au/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4 May 2011, the NSW Government introduced a Bill to enact the national model work health and safety legislation. The Bill was passed by the NSW Parliament on 1 June 2011. There are currently nine different work health and safety (WHS) laws across Australia. All states and territories have committed to working towards uniform safety standards ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmercurycom.com.au%2F2010%2F07%2Fnew-workcover-legislation-in-2012%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmercurycom.com.au%2F2010%2F07%2Fnew-workcover-legislation-in-2012%2F&amp;source=MercuryCom&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>On 4 May 2011, the NSW Government introduced <a title="This site will open in a new window" href="http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/nswbills.nsf/0/919DE88AD1F04EA5CA25788600208ADE" target="_blank">a Bill to enact the national model work health and safety legislation</a>. The Bill was passed by the NSW Parliament on 1 June 2011.</p>
<p>There are currently nine different work health and safety (WHS) laws across Australia. All states and territories have committed to working towards uniform safety standards across Australia.</p>
<p>The new work health and safety laws will:</p>
<ul>
<li>reduce compliance costs and red tape for employers</li>
<li>maintain NSW’s strong work, health and safety framework</li>
<li>keep businesses accountable</li>
<li>make laws easier to understand while protecting workers.</li>
</ul>
<p>Find out more and read the full article <a href="http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/newlegislation2012/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank">here on the Workcover site</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mercurycom.com.au/2010/07/new-workcover-legislation-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

